社會(huì)學(xué)專題：性別認(rèn)知的“閾值”，現(xiàn)代社會(huì)制度體系下性少數(shù)群體帶來(lái)的經(jīng)濟(jì)價(jià)值、政治意義與文化突破綜合探究

專業(yè)：社會(huì)科學(xué)

項(xiàng)目類型：國(guó)外小組科研

開始時(shí)間：2025年01月18日

是否可加論文：是

項(xiàng)目周期：7周在線小組科研學(xué)習(xí)+5周不限時(shí)論文指導(dǎo)學(xué)習(xí)

語(yǔ)言：英文

有無(wú)剩余名額：名額充足

建議學(xué)生年級(jí)：大學(xué)生 高中生

是否必需面試：否

適合專業(yè)：社會(huì)學(xué)社會(huì)心理學(xué)區(qū)域研究國(guó)際法公共政策法學(xué)法社會(huì)學(xué)國(guó)際經(jīng)濟(jì)法法律

地點(diǎn)：無(wú)

建議選修：多學(xué)科中的倫理學(xué)

建議具備的基礎(chǔ)：社會(huì)學(xué)、性別研究、女性主義、性少數(shù)研究、社會(huì)心理學(xué)、公共政策、經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)、社會(huì)工作等專業(yè)或希望修讀相關(guān)專業(yè)的學(xué)生。

產(chǎn)出：7周在線小組科研學(xué)習(xí)+5周不限時(shí)論文指導(dǎo)學(xué)習(xí) 共125課時(shí) 項(xiàng)目報(bào)告 優(yōu)秀學(xué)員獲主導(dǎo)師Reference Letter EI/CPCI/Scopus/ProQuest/Crossref/EBSCO或同等級(jí)別索引國(guó)際會(huì)議全文投遞與發(fā)表指導(dǎo)（可用于申請(qǐng)） 結(jié)業(yè)證書 成績(jī)單

項(xiàng)目背景：何為法律，法律的本質(zhì)是什么，法律與道德的關(guān)系又是什么？當(dāng)我們開始試圖探究在法律框架下的哲學(xué)問題，便開始逐漸走入法律哲學(xué)的領(lǐng)域。我們將通過探究法律的本質(zhì)，法律體系的基礎(chǔ)性角色，法律的目的以及法律推理來(lái)引導(dǎo)同學(xué)們深入理解法律的社會(huì)屬性、服務(wù)于公共利益的屬性與對(duì)于社會(huì)中個(gè)人的哲學(xué)層面的存在意義。在每一位法官和律師“針鋒相對(duì)”之時(shí)，在這些互相的對(duì)于法律的推理之中，法理學(xué)的存在都是幫助雙方沉默的和保持克制的重要因素。作為法官、律師、公民或是在讀法律學(xué)學(xué)生，如果沒有對(duì)：“什么是法律？”這一問題有足夠清晰的認(rèn)識(shí)，就無(wú)法回答任何法律相關(guān)的問題,例如：為什么法律與宗教、自然科學(xué)或社會(huì)科學(xué)是不同的但是又脫身于上述學(xué)科并且在人類社會(huì)中不斷進(jìn)化？

項(xiàng)目介紹：本項(xiàng)目旨在探討社會(huì)和政治競(jìng)爭(zhēng)在國(guó)家立法和具體法律應(yīng)用中的作用。項(xiàng)目將重點(diǎn)關(guān)注：生理性別與心理性別在法社會(huì)學(xué)中的一些特殊解釋，包括少數(shù)群體相關(guān)的訴訟案例分析；女性主義在現(xiàn)代社會(huì)制度中的“特權(quán)”；少數(shù)人群權(quán)益與背后的法律經(jīng)濟(jì)理論；案例中，學(xué)生將在解讀社會(huì)制度的同時(shí)關(guān)注種族、階級(jí)和性別等多變因素；推導(dǎo)論證中的主觀理性與客觀合理性以及相對(duì)應(yīng)的程度和限制；道德觀念在審判和律師工作中的具體作用，以及指導(dǎo)法律對(duì)社會(huì)規(guī)則的指導(dǎo)性作用。項(xiàng)目將以論文作為最終產(chǎn)出。
Jurisprudence is the silent and controlling partner in every judge’s and every lawyer’s reasoning about law. A judge, a lawyer, a citizen, a law student cannot answer any legal question without a sufficiently clear sense of what law is— as distinct, say, from religion, or hard science or social science— and what it is that constitutes legal reasoning and argument (as opposed to, say, reasoning in empirical science or theology or mathematics or logic). What sources may a judge consult to resolve a legal dispute, and on what sources should a lawyer rely in making an argument on behalf of a client? Only such commonplace sources as case precedents, statutes, constitutional provisions, administrative regulations, executive orders? May she also consult the bible, or works by moral, political, and legal philosophers? Why or why not?
These and related questions are the subject matter of Jurisprudence and of this course. In our exploration of these themes, we will consider competing explanations of the concept of law (among legal positivists, legal realists, natural law theorists, critical legal studies theorists), the role of social and political contest in lawmaking and law application (including approaches to this issue that focus on race, class, and gender in their explanations of law and legal institutions), the nature, extent and limits of reason and rationality in legal argument, the role of virtue in judging and lawyering, and the values that do or should guide legal factfinding.

項(xiàng)目大綱：法律的本源The nature of law 法律的高貴——女性主義理論導(dǎo)論Law’s Nobility - Introduction to Feminist Theories 經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)視角下的性、性別和法律Economic Theories of Sexuality, Gender, and the Law 社會(huì)運(yùn)動(dòng)的批判性分析Critical Analyses of Social Movements 關(guān)于性少數(shù)人群權(quán)利的性別歧視爭(zhēng)論The Sex Discrimination Argument for LGBTQ Rights 性別研究與法律相關(guān)的案例研究Case Study (more related to Economic Theories of Sexuality, Gender, and the Law) 項(xiàng)目回顧與成果展示 Program Review and Presentation 論文輔導(dǎo) Project Deliverables Tutoring